Golden Hope - a healthy correction

I know it is a terrible thing to say, but I saw the drop coming. I was looking at Golden Hope Mines last Tuesday and just like with one of my other stocks Tradewinds Ventures (TWD), the stock was way outside the bollinger bands in the weekly chart. The EMA-9 line crosses at around 0.65 and that to me seemed to be where one could have expected to see a correction heading. Unfortunately, I did cash in on my TWD stocks but not on GNH, wrong choice so far! Let's not forget that GNH gained 400% in a period of four months. We're now very close to the 38.2% fibonacci at 0.67 which should serve at least as an intermediate support level. I am not worried but then I am never too worried about single stocks because I do not put all my eggs into one basket (helps me sleep at night). Watch the orange line (EMA-9) for the time being. This chart quite nicely shows that we had a similar situation happening from 0.74 back to 0.50, also very close to the 38.2% fibonacci level. These are quite healthy corrections for such rapidly rising stocks and are nothing to worry about. Such corrections should not necessarily be seen as a negative interpretation of last week's news. Sometimes there are just some big parties waiting to take some temporary profits and I have to give it them, it was a good time to let the stock cool down. For now, considering that selling happened at such substantial volumes, it seems wise to be cautious. If a bearish cross occurs in the MACD, we may see a further correction. Other signals are not necessarily as bearish as the MACD would be: the RSI and slow stoch in the weekly have not seen overbought levels since end of June this year. Most importantly, I keep a close eye on the RSI. Provided that this indicator does not dip below the May low, the longer term uptrend is still intact. All other factors equal, we are still looking at a major buying opportunity here.

Junior miners: market manipulation or just underperformers?

The precious metals rally that ended in May 2006 was a very good time for almost any investment in mining, whether it was the AMEX Gold Bugs Index (HUI),the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Sector Index (XAU) or junior mining companies. But after that rally, something changed. After the spot gold price reached $730 in May 2006, there was a correction period that was followed by a rally to $1,030. Another correction followed and the gold price seems to near a bottom at the current levels around $900, still up roughly 24% from its May 2006 high.
The HUI-index has now fallen to a level just below the May 2006 high at 390. The XAU Index also seems to flirt with the support level around 160, which once again corresponds with the highest level reached in May 2006. The fact that these indices underperformed the precious metals price by more than 20% is already pretty shocking, but the picture becomes even darker when studying junior miners. The benchmark indices for Junior Mining companies, the FSO Index (see www.financialsense.com) which consists of 40 junior mining companies, is down almost 30% from its May 2006 high! Charts from Frank Barbera on a.m. website even show that the FSO/XAU ratio actually more than halved since the first quarter of 2007.
But what causes this severe underperformance of junior miners compared with large caps and with precious metals prices in particular? Some say that market manipulation is to blame. Market manipulation is one of those terms that always appears when precious metals or related stocks perform badly. The question is whether market manipulation is really that unrealistic. Let's take a closer look at some mining funds in Nunavut Territory in the North of Canada.
Nunavut was established in 1999 and is thereby the youngest Canadian province. Nunavut Territory is extremely rich in natural resources and as such offers great potential for various industries, including mining, fishing and tourism. As soon as precious metals prices started to rise, the (junior) miners in Nunavut saw their share prices rise along with the precious metals rally. Some of the companies that benefited were Cumberland Resources, Miramar Mining and WMC Resources.
One thing that those four Nunavut-plays have in common is that they were all taken over by large cap mining companies, that continue to look for Nunavut miners. In 2005, shareholders of Australian mining company WMC Resources had two potential buyers outbidding eachother. Eventually, the winning bid was made by BHP Billiton at A$7.85 per share, significantly higher than Xstrata's A$7.00 per share offer. This was a significant premium over the A$5.00 share price before the battle started. UBS Securities however rated the company in a valuation range of well over A$10 per share.
Cumberland Resources was acquired by Agnico-Eagle Mines in 2007 and did well. The company's shareholders received $7.48, roughly a 25% premium over the share price before the acquisition was announced. Shareholders who bought their shares two years prior to the deal would have easily made 400% return on investment.
Miramar Mining was bought by Newmont Mining this year for C$6.25 per share or a 23% premium over the price before the announcement. Those who bought Miramar shares two years prior to the deal made 84%, still not bad, but certainly a good deal for the buyer.
All above-mentioned deals may be 'good deals' for the buyer, but they are certainly not bad deals for the sellers. This is a situation that could now easily change. With junior mining shares having hit rock bottom, a 50% premium is still hardly something to cheer about for investors who saw their shares drop more than 50%.
Some of the Nunavut miners that are still independent seem almost guaranteed takeover targets, but the question is whether it's really worth it. Some deals outside Nunavut show a pretty scary picture. For instance, Aurelian Resources received sell recommendations with a price targets as low as C$1.40 in addition to a tsunami of negative rumours about Ecuadorian Government's mining laws. You have to ask yourself why all the bad news and downgrades are not affecting Kinross Gold Corp's judgment of Aurelian (still considered attractive at a share price well over C$8). The latest rumour is the Ecuadorian Government possibly bidding for Aurelian, which is the reason why the share price is still well-below the offer. This scenario is just another way to scare off investors, quite similar to news coverage of the the Venezuelan mining laws affecting Gold Reserve and Crystallex. So far, it's all rumours and one has to wonder whether these countries are really going to create a tremendous job loss and harm relations with any foreign company operating locally, or whether it's all one big Jim Cramer-esque conspiracy.
Geopolitical risks however do not apply to the Nunavut miners, but market manipulation may be as applicable to junior miners as it is to the producing miners in 'less politically-stable" countries. Fact of the matter is that takeover candidates are no longer by definition the desired stocks to hold. One of those takeover candidates is the junior (partly-)Nunavut play Trade Winds Ventures.
Trade Winds Ventures had a high in 2004 of C$1.65. It then fell back to the current five-year low of C$0.13. And what's really changed since then? Momentum, that's really all I can think of. In their Detour Lake project (Ontario) alone, they have 800K ounces of indicated resources and 1.5M ounces of inferred resources. In addition to that, Trade Winds have projects in Nunavut, China and in B.C. The company has an institutional share holder base, C$2.8M cash and has a market cap of only C$10M!
And this is just one example of a ridiculously cheap junior miner. There are so many players out there with ridiculous market capitalisations. The only thing you have to accept is that there is no guarantee that your investment will go down further in the short term. Whatever you do, don't sell. In the long run, the true value of these companies will emerge. For now, all we can do is hope that no one will take them over at a 30% or even 50% premium, for there is so much more potential in these junior miners. As for my disclosure: I hold no shares in Trade Winds Ventures, but I will buy on Tuesday the 5th as soon as Canada is open again.
Good luck to all.

Long gold again with $700 coming close?

After this month's changes in my mining portfolio, I have now decided that it's the right time to invest in precious metals again. I already bought (speculatively) DRDGold at $0.78 and after the 10:1 reverse split, the stock kept going down. I consider $6.50 a critical level and decided to sell once that level was broken. At $6.42 my sell order was executed, while the stock ended above $6.50 again. I am still quite convinced that DRDGold will manage to get its act together, but I am also certain that it is not the best stock for short term profits. Instead, I took a long position in gold at $662, knowing that there should be some support at $660 (being 61.8% retracement level), which was successfully tested and spot gold moved up to $665 today. Should gold move below $660, there is a high likelihood of a full retracement to $640 which for me would be a very bearish sign and possibly a reason to liquidate all my positions in precious metals and certainly a reason to reduce the mining share in my portfolio. But, being the positive-minded chap that I am, I added a position in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). I actually bought back shares in TGB. Previously, I bought TGB at $2.30 and sold at minor profits as there was little news to move the stock up. Now the situation is a lot more fruitful. The company is one of the very few AMEX-listed precious metals miners that actually makes money. Taseko has successfully positioned itself as a copper & gold miner and has a good cash position with a positive cashflow. Taseko's Prosperity and Harmony mines alone should account for some 7.5 mio ounces of proven & probable gold reserves, which already makes the company's USD 600M market capitalisation look reasonable. Add to that the company's young & producing Gibraltar copper mine and you have a clearly undervalued stock, despite its recent rise. This stock will go through the roofs in two or three years from now as the Prosperity mine will get closer to production. I think we have a winner.
The author bought TGB at $4.60 and closed his position in DROOD at $6.42.

Eldorado Gold sees Turkish mine shut down

It came to me as a complete shock, seeing one of my favourite mines down 30% on Thursday. A Turkish court had apparently ordered the shut down of Eldorado Gold's cash cow, the Kisladag mine, responsible for 60% of the company's gold production in 2006. According to Eldorado, the final decision by the court is still pending "on the appeal of a lower court order in favour of the company confirming the legality and validity of the Mine's Environmental Impact Assessment". The closure will be implemented in about 30 days. To clarify things, the company planned a conference call on Thursday evening and I was all ears. During the conference call, CEO Paul Wright was talking of a group of people whose only interest was to discourage mining in the country. He did not know the name of that group and he did not go into details on the specificalities of the court case. Last year, there was a problem with cyanide poisoning of villagers, which means that high levels of cyanide were found in villagers' blood. This was a result of the sodium cyanide heap leach method that was used by Eldorado during trial production and that presumably has been used until now. From what I found, the Environment Impact Assessment was initially accepted in 2003, but was later found incorrect by doctors and scientists and challenged in court by villagers, combined through a group called "Elele" (hand in hand). In addition to the cyanide poisoning, there were also reports of levels of arsenic in local drinking water. I can imagine if this all has been proven correct, that there are serious issues. Unfortunately, nothing was said about all this during the call. Problems with people opposing to the use of cyanide in the Kisladag region have been known since 1999, at the company did exploratory work. The first mining company that used cyanide in Turkey was Newmont Mining at its Ovacik mine in 2001. The mine was sold in 2005 to Turkish printing and mining company Koza Davetiye. The reason then given for the sale was the divestment of non-core assets. However, the Ovacik mine was - like the Kisladag mine - given bad publicity by Greenpeace and fought by locals in court, despite the company's approvals from Turkish Government. It sounds to me that this may be the start of something bad. According to Eldorado Gold's CEO, the decision that has been made was not supported by legal proof. But opposition against the use of cyanide in the local mining industry is clearly nothing new in Turkey. Maybe Newmont was not to keen on bad publicity either? I am however forced to review my position in Eldorado as the bad publicity is certainly not going to do the company any good and these environmental issues are usually not solved overnight.
At the time of writing, the author had a long position in the above-mentioned stock.

Two speculative gold plays

Within the mining industry as well as in the oil & gas industry, geopolitical risks are becoming more and more influential on share prices. This became quite clear this week when Chavez mentioned in a speech that all that was once privatised should be nationalised again. He specifically mentioned his desire to re-nationalise CANTV (Compañia Anonima Nacional Telefonos de Venezuela). The share price (NYSE:VNT) plunged as a result and took many other funds with it. Among these were certain mining funds that have at least part of their operations in Venezuela, including Crystallex International Corp (AMEX:KRY) and Gold Reserve Inc. (AMEX:GRZ). The risk in the mining sector was already priced into these two companies' shares last year when GRZ dropped from its April peak of USD 9.58 to USD 3.96 two months later. The same happened with KRY, which fell from USD 6.07 to USD 2.84, also in two months' time. Not helped by gold moving sideways for a period of eight months since its April peak, both stocks are now not far from where they were in June last year. The problem is clearly not their reserves. Both companies share prices are way too low if you take all proven & probable reserves into account. For only one reason: geopolitical fears. Crystallex issuing a press release to eliminate investor fears after Chavez' speech this week did not help the share price and was completely ignored. The Government of Venezuela has previously even confirmed that the present contract will be honoured by both parties, i.e. Chavez & Crystallex. The financial world now seems to neglect the 13.6 mio ounces of proven & probable reserves that Crystallex holds. With a market capitalisation of USD 785 mio, the market cap per ounce ration lies at USD 58. For comparison's sake, this is less than one tenth of that of Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Bema (NYSE:BGO). Gold Reserve has an estimated 10.1 mio ounces of gold and 1,290 mio ounces of copper at its major project Las Brisas in Venezuela, which means that it has an even more ridiculous market capitalisation per ounce of USD 11.30! And even though GRZ has a similar agreement with the Venezuelan Government, this too was ignored by investors. Then there is also a bilateral treaty that offers some protection to Canadian companies in case of nationalisations. So all and all, we can say that the risks are to a great extent priced into the stocks and there is a great possibility that the stocks moved down too much on the news and that fears have been overrated. Would, in my humble opinion, these companies have had all their operations in politically stable countries, both share prices would have been at least 300% higher based on their reserves. It's a simple calculation. The only thing to rate is the risk and will always be a subjective rating. But the potential rewards certainly outweigh the risks and I therefore recommend both stocks as buy candidates. My preference however goes to Gold Reserve Inc for a number of reasons, of which the market capitalisation per ounce is the most obvious one. Do however still keep the risk in mind and therefore consider this a speculative buy. I would set price targets for this year at USD 6 for Crystallex and at USD 12 for Gold Reserve Inc.